Did you know that orthopaedic surgeries can be performed on patients without any clinical proof that they actually work?!
In fact there's a growing body of evidence that many of the most commonly performed joint surgeries have no more success in relieving pain and restoring function than a placebo treatment.
A 2021 meta-analysis study (1) published in the BMJ (British Medical Journal) states that musculoskeletal conditions accounted for over 25% of all surgeries performed by the NHS.
This same study found that the 10 most popularly performed orthopaedic surgeries did not have high quality, randomised clinical trials to back up whether they worked or were more effective than conservative treatments or a placebo procedure (sham operation).
And yet the public is still being told that invasive surgeries are the best and, in some cases, only way to relieve musculoskeletal pain by medical practitioners.
The most commonly performed orthopaedic surgeries are:
The 2021 BMJ analysis (1) found that arthroscopic repairs for traumatic meniscal tears was slightly more effective than non-surgical treatments, but arthroscopy for degenerative wear and tear did not work any better than conservative methods, such as a supervised exercise programme.
In 2017 (2) the BMJ published this clinical guideline for treating degenerative knee pain with the following recommendations:
We make a strong recommendation against the use of arthroscopy in nearly all patients with degenerative knee disease, based on linked systematic reviews; further research is unlikely to alter this recommendation
This recommendation applies to patients with or without imaging evidence of osteoarthritis, mechanical symptoms, or sudden symptom onset
Healthcare administrators and funders may use the number of arthroscopies performed in patients with degenerative knee disease as an indicator of quality care.
And yet knee arthroscopies are still being pushed as the first line of treatment for chronic knee pain.
Lumbar spine fusion used to performed routinely for degenerative disc disease. Fortunately it's on the decline and isn't usually offered as the first choice treatment option.
In my experience of training clients who've had spinal fusion surgery they've all had varying results from their op, but also complications and movement compensations that can be directly attributed to the surgery.
A 2005 RCT (randomised clinical trial) looked at 349 patients aged 18 to 55 years with chronic low back pain of at least 1 years duration and who were considered suitable candidates for surgery (3).
Half were assigned to spinal fusion surgery and half enrolled on a rehab programme based on CBT principles. Both groups were followed up after 2 years.
The trial found that both groups reported a reduction in disability, possibly unrelated to either intervention. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups.
The story is similar with the shoulder.
An interesting 2015 research article (4) published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine found that 26.6% of repaired rotator cuffs showed a tear on MRI scans taken 23 months post surgery.
Even more interesting was that patients felt they had recovered even if their rotator cuff showed a post-op re-tear on MRI.
In other words, the patients in this American study believed that their shoulder was better even if the rotator cuff looked exactly the same before and after surgery!
Another point to consider is that some surgeries to relieve chronic shoulder pain involve removing some of the structure responsible for stabilising the shoulder complex.....hmmm!
When you get a diagnosis or a scan image showing damage to a body part, such as knee osteoarthritis, spinal disc degeneration or a shoulder tear or impingement, you tend to attribute all your pain to that finding.
A story begins to form - "If I can fix my osteoarthritis / dodgy disc / torn shoulder I'll get out of pain".
So you look for anything that will treat the problem body part, and surgeries are often promoted as the best / only way to repair the damaged joint.
This viewpoint is reinforced by doctors, surgeons, physiotherapists, chiropractors and soft tissue therapists who are trained to treat musculoskeletal injuries and chronic pain according to a simple structural, biomechanical model.
This totally ignores the neurophysiological aspects of pain, movement compensations and long-term injuries, such as sensory motor amnesia, central sensitisation, hypervigilance and cell oxidative stress.
This blog is not meant to make a blanket statement that all orthopaedic surgeries are useless, or that people never get any relief from these operations.
Of course there are times when surgical repair is necessary or the best option based on an individual case by case basis.
But orthopaedic surgeries are expensive, there are often long waiting times on the NHS, invasive and not without risk of infection developing in the joint.
They also require a structured, supervised post-op rehab programme. This is rarely included with the NHS, and paying for months of private physiotherapy and training is costly.
The BYB Method is a unique and effective system for finding lasting relief from pain. It addresses the different components that feed persistent and recurring pain.
The 4x pillars of The BYB Method are:
The BYB Method provides a framework to help you find your pain-free body by addressing unconsciously held patterns of muscle tension that leads to persistent pain. This is a phenomenon known as sensory motor amnesia (SMA).
The BYB Method involves simple exercises and explorations that can be done in the comfort of your home, without the need for additional expensive equipment or supplements.
These movement practices to relieve muscle tension and pain can take as little as 10 minutes a day.
To find out more about my classes and retreats, or to join my email list you can contact me via any of these channels: